jump to navigation

COMMENT ON THE FEDERAL HEALTH IT STRATEGIC PLAN April 29, 2011

Posted by jaxncmd in EMR "Hot Topics", General EMR information.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

For today’s post, I would like to point out the opportunity that is available to comment on The Federal Health Information Technology Strategic Plan for 2011-2015. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology has extended the public comment period through May 6, 2011.

For anyone concerned about healthcare, this document defines the government’s plan “to transform the healthcare system by improving the flow of information through health IT.” The Plan builds upon the current healthcare IT programs and also “charts new ground for the federal health IT agenda.”

This comment period provides an excellent opportunity for physicians, along with all other interested parties, to add their voices to the decisions regarding the direction that healthcare in the United States will take in the future.

Here is the link to the ONC website to review and comment on the Strategic Plan – Federal Health IT Strategic Plan Open for Public Comment – and I have included the comment that I submitted regarding of the Strategic Plan below.

 

Dr. Mostashari -

I appreciate the opportunity to comment on The Federal Health Information Technology Strategic Plan. I would like to first state that I am a supporter for the utilization of electronic health records and believe that health information technology can serve an important role in healthcare delivery. There is a major omission in the proposed Strategic Plan, however, that I find to be a significant area of concern.

Throughout the proposed Strategic Plan, there is the complete absence of a major component for any successful healthcare – responsibility. Responsibility is lacking within this Strategic Plan both figuratively and literally, as the word “responsibility” does not even appear within the document.

The absence of responsibility extends throughout the Plan. The government’s proposal includes efforts to “encourage”, “enhance”, “inspire”, and “promote” efforts for the implementation of health information technology, but at no point does the government take ownership or direct responsibility for the results of these efforts.

The establishment of the Nationwide Health Information Network serves as an example. This Network is supposed to serve as “the preferred solution to securely exchange information nationwide to support meaningful use.” While ONC will establish “a governance mechanism through rulemaking” for the Network, “governance rules will be established as a voluntary solution to health information exchange” and “the government will pursue various options to encourage participation in this preferred solution.” So while the government will create the rules for the health information exchange, and encourage participation in it, it abdicates any responsibility for the outcomes associated with the use of this Network as it remains a “voluntary solution.”

This aversion to responsibility is even more clearly evident in regard to the proposed requirements that are to serve as the foundation for stages two and three of the EHR Incentive Programs. The Plan calls for these stages to include incorporation of “more sophisticated uses of health IT, such as clinical decision support, patient registries, reminder systems, and changes to workflow and clinical care redesign.” The current Strategic Plan, however, fails to address or even consider the repercussions that these requirements will have on the participating providers.

Specifically, the Strategic Plan does not contain any assessment or consideration for the legal consequences and liabilities that these government programs will create. These consequences include important and very practical issues, such as the medical malpractice implications that may result from the incorporation of clinical decision support into the EHR system. The handling and management of patient data caused by participation in registries is another source of significant legal questions, such as when the provider’s responsibility for securing the patient’s data ends and the health information exchange’s responsibility begins.

To address this deficiency regarding the legal responsibilities, I would recommend adding an additional “Goal VI” to the current Strategic Plan. This Goal would be to “Address and Clarify the Legal Ramifications of the Adoption and Utilization of Health IT.”

Finally, the most significant omission of “responsibility” in the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan is the lack of any discussion regarding the responsibilities of one of the major participants in U.S. healthcare – the ‘private’ commercial insurance companies.

If the Mission for this Plan is “to improve health and healthcare for all Americans”, then the commercial insurance companies must be an active participant in this program. These companies play a major role in the management and utilization of healthcare resources in this country. If the current Strategic Plan truly represents the national health IT agenda, then the private insurance companies must be integrated into this plan to a degree commensurate with the position that they currently hold in healthcare, including fully defining their role, the degree of their participation, their financial contribution, and their responsibilities.

Once again, I am very thankful for the opportunity to comment on the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan. I hope that my comments are helpful and constructive, and I look forward to the final version.

THE NEXT GENERATION OF TECH VS. THE CURRENT GENERATION OF EHR April 20, 2011

Posted by jaxncmd in EMR "Hot Topics", General EMR information.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

I was recently watching the morning program Squawk Box on CNBC when it ran a segment called “Masters of the Market”. The episode that morning featured Roger McNamee, managing director and cofounder of Elevation Partners. He was discussing his long-term outlook on technology and the important issues that he felt would shape the future of technology. He specifically felt that Microsoft Windows would experience a continued decline, particularly as smartphones and tablets continue to increase. He also believed that there would be a significant clash regarding the Internet, with the world wide web/browser model versus the app model.

I found his comments extremely interesting, particularly since his predictions were based on the current trends that are already occurring in tech. Although he was discussing the general market outlook for the technology sector, I quickly found myself reflecting on the current state of electronic health records in regard to his revelations.

While the current initiatives to promote EHR are looked upon as “transformative advances” in healthcare, after listening to this discussion, I was left feeling that it was possible that the upcoming “advances” in healthcare may unfortunately represent “yesterday’s technology” once they arrive.

The biggest reason for my concern is based on the fact that the current EHR systems are essentially Windows or browser-based systems. These two areas were focused on in McNamee’s comments as potential areas of significant change in the technology market.

While Microsoft Windows will probably never completely go away, the fact that corporateAmericahas already been moving away from its reliance on Windows could potentially represent a significant concern for physicians in the future, particularly in small medical practices. If there is a dramatic shift from Windows, or if Microsoft adopts a completely different strategy or platform, then small medical practices may be left with “legacy” Windows-based EHR systems that are no longer supported as healthcare IT moves forward. The economic repercussions of such a change could be devastating for small medical practices since they typically lack the financial resources that larger healthcare organizations can access (thereby reducing their ability to access significant IT support or to absorb the cost of having to obtain an entirely new EHR system).

This same scenario of an outdated platform could also affect the browser-based EHR applications. Although the economic impact would seem to be less of an issue, the fact that there is significant competition ongoing between the browser-based and application-based models may potentially have repercussions. In addition, the eventual introduction of HTML5 into the web-based systems may create potential compatibility issues unless the web-based EHR software companies are vigilant in maintaining their products.

Given the status of EHR/EMR from even a decade ago, the current environment for electronic health records obviously represents a dramatic leap forward in technology.  I raise these issues for consideration, however, to point out the simple fact that while the current EHR/EMR may represent a significant advance in healthcare, in many respects, healthcare information technology itself appears to still be significantly behind the times when compared to the advances in the overall technology sector. Hopefully, as the EHR initiative continues to advance, this gap between the current reality of healthcare IT and the current/next generation of technology (in general) will continue to close, thereby eventually allowing the electronic health record to deliver on its full potential for the future of healthcare in theUnited States.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.